Author pitrou
Recipients akr, barry, benjamin.peterson, dmalcolm, glyph, gregory.p.smith, iankko, loewis, pitrou, psss, thoger
Date 2010-05-04.14:09:48
SpamBayes Score 0.000218489
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1272982331.3554.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> Can anyone move this to Stage: patch review (for the fix approach
> proposed in msg90336)?  Or does anyone have better idea on how to move
> this closer to final fix or wontfix / reject?  Thank you!

I stand by my opinion that adding another hack in the initialization
path will not do us a lot of good, while a separate API would solve the
problem neatly. Perhaps Dave Malcolm can chime in?
Date User Action Args
2010-05-04 14:09:49pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, barry, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, glyph, psss, iankko, akr, thoger, dmalcolm
2010-05-04 14:09:48pitroulinkissue5753 messages
2010-05-04 14:09:48pitroucreate