Author vstinner
Recipients Arfrever, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, lemburg, loewis, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2010-05-03.20:12:08
SpamBayes Score 9.96997e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1272917530.21.0.0788060792885.issue8514@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Why is that? In msg104063, you claim that you want to create these
> functions to deal with file names (not environment variables)

Yes, but my os_path_fs_encode_decode-3.patch uses it in getenv() which is maybe a bad idea: os.environb may avoid this.

> in msg104064, you claim that #8513 (which is about the program name in
> subprocess) would benefit from these functions. Do these use cases
> become invalid if os.environb becomes available?

#8513 is also related to environment variables: subprocess._execute_child() calls os.get_exec_path() which search the PATH environment variable. It would be nice to support bytes environment variable in the env argument of Popen constructor (bytes key and/or value).
History
Date User Action Args
2010-05-03 20:12:10vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, lemburg, loewis, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, ezio.melotti, Arfrever
2010-05-03 20:12:10vstinnersetmessageid: <1272917530.21.0.0788060792885.issue8514@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-05-03 20:12:08vstinnerlinkissue8514 messages
2010-05-03 20:12:08vstinnercreate