Message 104465 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	techtonik
Recipients	ajaksu2, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, l0nwlf, techtonik
Date	2010-04-28.21:40:27
SpamBayes Score	0.003575358
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1272490829.4.0.477889166774.issue7584@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I do not think that -00:00 or +00:00 will be invalid Atom timestamp, but to implement parser of rfc3339 timestamp, Z handling is still needed. I can easily imagine people making wrong assumption that parsing 00:00 at the end would be enough for proper round-tripping.

I do not think that -00:00 or +00:00 will be invalid Atom timestamp, but to implement parser of rfc3339 timestamp, Z handling is still needed. I can easily imagine people making wrong assumption that parsing 00:00 at the end would be enough for proper round-tripping.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-04-28 21:40:29	techtonik	set	recipients: + techtonik, ajaksu2, eric.araujo, daniel.urban, l0nwlf
2010-04-28 21:40:29	techtonik	set	messageid: <1272490829.4.0.477889166774.issue7584@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-04-28 21:40:27	techtonik	link	issue7584 messages
2010-04-28 21:40:27	techtonik	create