Author spiv
Recipients exarkun, neologix, r.david.murray, spiv
Date 2010-04-15.23:29:13
SpamBayes Score 5.70692e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1271374154.94.0.555018365572.issue8354@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I'm not exactly sure how we will know if it is expected to fail,
> though.  I don't think `HAVE_SIGACTION` is exposed nicely to Python
> right now.

It might be useful to have the contents of pyconfig.h exposed as a dict somehow.  Maybe call it sys._pyconfig_h?

A less ambitious change would be to expose just HAVE_SIGACTION as e.g. signal._have_sigaction.

I agree with r.david.murray that we probably don't need to bother unless a buildbot or someone reports that this test fails.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-04-15 23:29:15spivsetrecipients: + spiv, exarkun, r.david.murray, neologix
2010-04-15 23:29:14spivsetmessageid: <1271374154.94.0.555018365572.issue8354@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-04-15 23:29:13spivlinkissue8354 messages
2010-04-15 23:29:13spivcreate