Message103208
Are there any platforms that define HAVE_SIGINTERRUPT but that do not define HAVE_SIGACTION? If there are, then yes I expect they would fail that test.
It would be a shame to delay this fix just because it doesn't fix all platforms... is it possible to mark that test as a known failure on a platform with siginterrupt but without sigaction?
My initial comment outlined a change that would work for all platforms, but would be more complex. (I think the signal_noreinstall.diff change would be good to make even with the more complex approach, though.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-15 13:38:56 | spiv | set | recipients:
+ spiv, exarkun, r.david.murray, neologix |
2010-04-15 13:38:55 | spiv | set | messageid: <1271338735.69.0.0592540237151.issue8354@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-15 13:38:54 | spiv | link | issue8354 messages |
2010-04-15 13:38:54 | spiv | create | |
|