Message102727
I reread http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt and I'm pretty sure that
if getnode() is supposed to return a hardware address, one of the
following should be used:
1) If ifconfig etc. returns successfully, we are fine.
2) If uuid_generate_time() or UuidCreateSequential() are used
to extract the node ID, we have to make sure that the returned
UUID is in fact RFC_4122 and version 1.
3) The fallback node ID should be 47 bits according to section 4.5.
I've got a new patch (getnode.patch) that takes care of these issues. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-09 15:38:06 | skrah | set | recipients:
+ skrah, tim.peters, nnorwitz, pitrou, ajaksu2 |
2010-04-09 15:38:05 | skrah | set | messageid: <1270827485.94.0.25021658174.issue3581@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-09 15:38:04 | skrah | link | issue3581 messages |
2010-04-09 15:38:04 | skrah | create | |
|