Message102708
Thanks for your suggestions on the test code. I will do that.
It seems like the hard-coded approach would be more brittle. For example, if someone wants to replace __import__ with their own, e.g.
old__import__ = __builtins__.__import__
def __my_logging_import(*args, **kwargs):
print "Importing %s..." % args[0] # module name
return old__import__(*args, **kwargs)
__builtins__.__import__ = __my_logging_import
Then the stack traces would be different:
File "/Users/chris_g4/dev/Python/trunk/Lib/unittest/loader.py", line 92, in loadTestsFromName
module = __import__('.'.join(parts_copy))
File "unittests.py", line 8, in __my_logging_import
return old__import__(*args, **kwargs)
ImportError: No module named sdasfasfasdf
This causes the unit tests not to pass. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-09 11:15:11 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients:
+ chris.jerdonek, rbcollins, r.david.murray, michael.foord, slmnhq |
2010-04-09 11:15:11 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1270811711.12.0.671670010696.issue7559@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-09 11:15:09 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue7559 messages |
2010-04-09 11:15:08 | chris.jerdonek | create | |
|