Message102523
> >> I also found out that, according to RFC 3629, surrogates
> >> are considered invalid and they can't be encoded/decoded,
> >> but the UTF-8 codec actually does it.
> >
> > Python2 does, but Python3 raises an error.
> > (...)
>
> I wonder how that change got into the 3.x branch - I would certainly
> not have approved it for the reasons given further up on this ticket.
>
> I think we should revert that change for Python 3.2.
See r72208 and issue #3672.
pitrou wrote "We could fix it for 3.1, and perhaps leave 2.7 unchanged if some
people rely on this (for whatever reason)." |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-07 09:02:04 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, lemburg, sjmachin, ezio.melotti, dangra |
2010-04-07 09:02:02 | vstinner | link | issue8271 messages |
2010-04-07 09:02:02 | vstinner | create | |
|