Message101583
Re-opening to address a couple of points that came out of the python-dev discussion:
(1) As Stefan pointed out on python-dev, equality and inequality comparisons involving signaling nans should signal (order comparisons already do). IEEE 754 is fairly clear on this. From section 6.2:
"""Signaling NaNs shall be reserved operands that, under default exception handling, signal the invalid operation exception (see 7.2) for every general-computational and signaling-computational operation except for the conversions described in 5.12."""
(Comparisons fall under 'signaling-computational operations, in section 5.6 of the standard.)
I propose to fix this for 2.7 and 3.2.
(2) Currently hash(Decimal("nan")) raises a TypeError. I can see no good reason for this at all; it's possible to hash float nans and to put them in sets and dictionaries. I propose to remove this restriction for 2.7 and 3.2. I think hash(Decimal("snan")) should also succeed: *computational* operations on signaling nans should signal, but I don't think that putting a signaling nan into a dict, or checking for its presence in a list, counts as a computational operation for this purpose. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-03-23 14:57:47 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, skrah |
2010-03-23 14:57:47 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1269356267.83.0.16630560363.issue7279@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-03-23 14:57:46 | mark.dickinson | link | issue7279 messages |
2010-03-23 14:57:45 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|