Author vbr
Recipients akitada, akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jaylogan, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, rsc, sjmachin, timehorse, vbr
Date 2010-03-16.21:37:49
SpamBayes Score 0.000237899
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1268775471.57.0.412266458296.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I am not sure about the testsuite for this regex module, but it seems to me, that many of the problems reported here probably don't apply for the current builtin re, as they are connected with the new features of regex.
After the suggestion in msg91462. I briefly checked the re testsuite and found it very comprehensive, given the featureset. Of course, most/all? re tests should apply for regex, but probably not vice versa.
vbr
History
Date User Action Args
2010-03-16 21:37:51vbrsetrecipients: + vbr, loewis, akuchling, georg.brandl, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, nneonneo, rsc, timehorse, mark, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, r.david.murray
2010-03-16 21:37:51vbrsetmessageid: <1268775471.57.0.412266458296.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-03-16 21:37:50vbrlinkissue2636 messages
2010-03-16 21:37:49vbrcreate