Author ezio.melotti
Recipients akitada, akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jaylogan, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, rsc, sjmachin, timehorse, vbr
Date 2010-03-16.19:31:24
SpamBayes Score 0.00224669
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1268767885.59.0.217642263157.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Does regex.py have its own test suite (which also includes tests for all the problems reported in the last few messages)?
If so, the new tests could be merged in re's test_re. This will simplify the testing of regex.py and will improve the test coverage of re.py, possibly finding new bugs. It will also be useful to check if the two libraries behave in the same way.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-03-16 19:31:25ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, loewis, akuchling, georg.brandl, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, nneonneo, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, r.david.murray
2010-03-16 19:31:25ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1268767885.59.0.217642263157.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-03-16 19:31:24ezio.melottilinkissue2636 messages
2010-03-16 19:31:24ezio.melotticreate