This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jcea
Recipients jcea
Date 2010-03-16.13:12:22
SpamBayes Score 4.6004843e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1268745144.38.0.358803942523.issue8156@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
This issue tracks the progress of integration of pybsddb 4.8.3+ and centralize related discussion.

I have integrated all bsddb related patches until r78988, in pybsddb 4.8.3+, with the following caveats:

- The new code supports BDB 4.8, but drops support for 4.0. Berkeley DB 4.0 was released in 2001...

- Revert issue6949 (the 2.7 part). This integration work supercedes it.

- issue6462 is not integrated in pybsddb, but will be retained in the code integrated in python. I will try to resolve it in a permanent way after integration.

- issue3892 is not integrated in pybsddb, but will be retained in the code integrated in python. I will try to resolve it in a permanent way after integration.

- issue7975: I can't reproduce this bug with current pybsddb version. I will keep the patch around, but first integration test will not include it, unless we still can reproduce.

Some changes in bsddb testsuite require 2.7/3.2. I have decided to keep the changes, so I have to backport some code and use conditional execution, because I must support python 2.3-2.7 and 3.0-3.2.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-03-16 13:12:24jceasetrecipients: + jcea
2010-03-16 13:12:24jceasetmessageid: <1268745144.38.0.358803942523.issue8156@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-03-16 13:12:22jcealinkissue8156 messages
2010-03-16 13:12:22jceacreate