Message10040
Logged In: YES
user_id=133413
Um ...
# patch -p1 <../conf.txt
patching file `configure.in'
patching file `configure'
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?
[n]
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1428.
2 out of 267 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to configure.rej
If I say yes to -R, almost all hunks fail.
***************
*** 1,6 ****
#! /bin/sh
- # From configure.in Revision: 1.288.6.3
# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create
Makefiles.
# Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.13
--- 1,6 ----
#! /bin/sh
+ # From configure.in Revision: 1.288.6.4
# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create
Makefiles.
# Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.13
***************
*** 1428,1434 ****
fi
case $ac_sys_system in
AIX*)
- LINKCC="\$(srcdir)/Modules/makexp_aix
Modules/python.exp \"\" \$(LIBRARY); $(LINKCC)";;
dgux*)
LINKCC="LD_RUN_PATH=$libdir $(LINKCC)";;
Monterey64*)
--- 1428,1434 ----
fi
case $ac_sys_system in
AIX*)
+ LINKCC="\$(srcdir)/Modules/makexp_aix
Modules/python.exp \"\" \$(LIBRARY); $LINKCC";;
dgux*)
LINKCC="LD_RUN_PATH=$libdir $(LINKCC)";;
Monterey64*)
Well, I'll try it as patched - those hunks don't look like
much is lost.
The config.log doesn't look good:
configure:2016: checking for sys/resource.h
configure:2026: gcc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out
In file included from /usr/include/sys/resource.h:25,
from configure:2022:
/usr/include/bits/resource.h:109: warning: `RLIM_INFINITY'
redefined
/usr/include/asm/resource.h:26: warning: this is the
location of the previous definition
configure: failed program was:
#line 2021 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#include <sys/resource.h>
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:00:11 | admin | link | issue535545 messages |
2007-08-23 14:00:11 | admin | create | |
|