Author mrabarnett
Recipients akitada, akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, collinwinter, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jaylogan, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, rsc, sjmachin, timehorse, vbr
Date 2010-03-04.00:41:56
SpamBayes Score 5.99686e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1267663318.57.0.554650078388.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
\X shouldn't be allowed in a character class because it's equivalent to \P{M}\p{M}*. It's a bug, now fixed in issue2636-20100304.zip.

I'm not convinced about the set intersection and difference stuff. Isn't that overdoing it a little? :-)
History
Date User Action Args
2010-03-04 00:41:58mrabarnettsetrecipients: + mrabarnett, loewis, akuchling, georg.brandl, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, nneonneo, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, ezio.melotti, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, r.david.murray
2010-03-04 00:41:58mrabarnettsetmessageid: <1267663318.57.0.554650078388.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-03-04 00:41:57mrabarnettlinkissue2636 messages
2010-03-04 00:41:56mrabarnettcreate