Message100261
I'd be open to re-allowing use of __int__ (and __long__) consistently for all integer packing codes in 2.7, as a temporary measure; I'd really prefer not to allow this for 3.x.
What would make more sense, IMO, would be to allow use of the __index__ method (in both 2.7 and 3.x) to convert custom non-integer classes to integers before packing; this is supposed to be the modern approach to creating integer-like classes that can be used as integers (e.g., in list indices). Andreas, would this work for you, or do you need to be able to use __int__ and/or __long__?
Re-opening while we're discussing this. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-03-01 19:37:17 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, nnorwitz, georg.brandl, collinwinter, jafo, bob.ippolito, piman, inducer, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson |
2010-03-01 19:37:17 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1267472237.23.0.166681658609.issue1530559@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-03-01 19:37:15 | mark.dickinson | link | issue1530559 messages |
2010-03-01 19:37:14 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|