➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010-08-04 13:07 by ronaldoussoren, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg112797 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) *  |
Date: 2010-08-04 13:06 | |
Distutils in the py3k trunk was reverted to the version in the 31-maint branch a couple of weeks back. This reintroduced some macos9 support code that was removed in the trunk but not the maint branches. All code reverting to sys.platform == 'mac' should be removed again. |
|||
| msg120585 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2010-11-06 06:19 | |
Fixed in r86248, thanks. BTW, my commit removes a bit more than yours originally did. In 2.7, the unused distutils.sysconfig._init_mac function is still left over. I don’t know if killing dead code is acceptable in a stable version. Benjamin? |
|||
| msg120613 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * |
Date: 2010-11-06 13:36 | |
Fine. 2010/11/6 Éric Araujo <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: > > Fixed in r86248, thanks. BTW, my commit removes a bit more than yours originally did. > > In 2.7, the unused distutils.sysconfig._init_mac function is still left over. I don’t know if killing dead code is acceptable in a stable version. Benjamin? > > ---------- > assignee: tarek -> eric.araujo > nosy: +benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo > resolution: -> fixed > stage: -> committed/rejected > status: open -> closed > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue9508> > _______________________________________ > |
|||
| msg120615 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2010-11-06 14:17 | |
Thanks for the reply. r86264. |
|||
| msg122887 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2010-11-30 06:32 | |
On python-dev, Martin commented that if it was unnecessary to remove an unused function in 2.7, then I shouldn’t have done it. I agreed, planned to revert that removal, however unlikely it was that someone depended on it, and then I couldn’t make up my mind in the middle of diverging opinions that followed. I missed the 3.1.3 release deadline, so the change is out there now. I’m going to leave 2.7 as it is, and at the first complaint about broken third-party code I’ll revert the removal. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:04 | admin | set | github: 53717 |
| 2010-11-30 06:32:02 | eric.araujo | set | nosy:
+ loewis messages: + msg122887 |
| 2010-11-06 14:17:40 | eric.araujo | set | messages: + msg120615 |
| 2010-11-06 13:36:07 | benjamin.peterson | set | messages: + msg120613 |
| 2010-11-06 06:19:48 | eric.araujo | set | status: open -> closed assignee: tarek -> eric.araujo nosy: + eric.araujo, benjamin.peterson messages: + msg120585 resolution: fixed stage: resolved |
| 2010-08-04 13:07:00 | ronaldoussoren | create | |