➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010-04-10 11:41 by eric.araujo, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| remove-assert-in-total_ordering.diff | eric.araujo, 2010-04-10 11:41 | |||
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg102770 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *  |
Date: 2010-04-10 11:41 | |
Hello The correct behavior of functools.total_ordering depends on a check performed with an assert. Attached patch changes it to a test that always runs. Since it’s a kind of protocol error, I went for TypeError but you may disagree. Regards |
|||
| msg102787 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2010-04-10 16:44 | |
The max(roots) line that follows will raise its own ValueError when given an empty input. Will mull over your patch. I may just delete the assert line, leave it as-is, or apply something like your patch (but with a ValueError). |
|||
| msg102788 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2010-04-10 16:57 | |
Ok. It won’t have a user-friendly error message, though. You may be interested in a minor doc patch in #5341. Regards |
|||
| msg102789 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2010-04-10 17:01 | |
r79930 and r79931 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:59 | admin | set | github: 52608 |
| 2010-04-10 18:54:40 | ezio.melotti | set | status: open -> closed stage: resolved |
| 2010-04-10 17:01:04 | rhettinger | set | resolution: fixed messages: + msg102789 |
| 2010-04-10 16:57:06 | eric.araujo | set | messages: + msg102788 |
| 2010-04-10 16:44:39 | rhettinger | set | messages: + msg102787 |
| 2010-04-10 16:29:06 | rhettinger | set | assignee: rhettinger |
| 2010-04-10 11:41:24 | eric.araujo | create | |