➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2009-01-11 05:37 by MLModel, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg79590 - (view) | Author: Mitchell Model (MLModel) | Date: 2009-01-11 05:37 | |
In the Numeric Types documentation for 2.6, 3.0, and 3.1 trunc is documented as a built-in, like round, but while there is a trunc in math there is no built-in trunc. Read some of the debate on trunc from a year ago convinced me that this discrepancy is a documentation problem not a problem with the built-in functions. Sorry if I'm completely off target here, but since I noticed I figured it was worth an issue. |
|||
| msg80005 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) *  |
Date: 2009-01-17 07:44 | |
Confirmed for 3.0 that trunc does not exist in the builtins module and is not listed in the Built-in functions section but is listed in the Numeric Types section. So I agree "trunc(x) x truncated to Integral " should leave the Operation table. Yes, MM, we do want to clean up such discrepancies. trunc is in the math module and is listed in its doc. |
|||
| msg80089 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2009-01-18 10:48 | |
Thanks, fixed in r68721. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:44 | admin | set | github: 49164 |
| 2009-01-18 10:48:24 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: + msg80089 |
| 2009-01-17 07:44:57 | terry.reedy | set | nosy:
+ terry.reedy messages: + msg80005 |
| 2009-01-11 05:37:15 | MLModel | create | |