Issue for tracking improving performance of pathlib module.

Please provide benchmarks and reasons in the ticket. A BPO issue should contain all relevant information for a change.

Optimizations include:

- Remove redundant check for functools lru_cache
- Replace attrgetter as it is slower than direct access

Benchmarks for attrgetter is provided in the PR.

I presume https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/discussions/194 is also relevant.

Note: attrgetter could easily be made faster by migrating it to use vectorcall.

> Note: attrgetter could easily be made faster by migrating it to use vectorcall.

Sure, though code that *doesn't* use attrgetter is usually easier to read -- attrgetter is rare enough in my experience that I usually have to look it up. So making attrgetter unnecessary in most cases would also be welcome.

(The exception is when you have many trivial pass-through properties, or when the attribute name is a variable to begin with.)

I have https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/27828 open already to add vectorcall to itemgetter and attrgetter

I am withdrawing this for now and since there is already a bpo for vectorcall I am closing this.

A note about benchmarks: I think timeit is not the right tool for them, but https://github.com/python/pyperformance is