➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2021-09-19 00:58 by andrei.avk, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 28453 | open | andrei.avk, 2021-09-19 01:04 | |
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg402142 - (view) | Author: Andrei Kulakov (andrei.avk) *  |
Date: 2021-09-19 00:58 | |
It would be useful to have +REPORT_NDIFF option applied to pdb doctests because it makes it much more convenient to add / modify pdb tests, to fix pdb bugs, add pdb features. I've worked on two pdb issues in the last few months and I wasn't aware of +REPORT_NDIFF, and so I was just looking at the output of failing tests (which are very long for some pdb tests), and comparing them manually. This option, when enabled, automatically provides diff with in-line highlighted difference for a failed doctest. Otherwise two chunks of text are provided, 'EXPECTED' and 'GOT ...'. |
|||
| msg402583 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) *  |
Date: 2021-09-24 20:06 | |
Lukasz, there is no current doctest expert and I think that this is something you could either accept or reject fairly quickly. Since the enhancement is to the tests, it could be backported. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:50 | admin | set | github: 89403 |
| 2021-09-24 20:06:44 | terry.reedy | set | nosy:
+ terry.reedy, lukasz.langa messages: + msg402583 |
| 2021-09-19 01:04:56 | andrei.avk | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request26855 |
| 2021-09-19 00:58:51 | andrei.avk | create | |