This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: Language Reference failing to describe the treatment of starred expressions
Type: Stage:
Components: Documentation Versions: Python 3.9
process
Status: open Resolution:
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: docs@python Nosy List: Takuo Matsuoka, docs@python
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2021-08-26 13:49 by Takuo Matsuoka, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin.

Messages (1)
msg400346 - (view) Author: Takuo Matsuoka (Takuo Matsuoka) Date: 2021-08-26 13:49
The issue is described as Issue (1) here:

https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/BEGGQEU6MG7RYIY7HB4I6VQ23L6TXB6H/

Please look at "Note" just before "Issues treated" there as
well. What's mentioned in this note is also filed in this issue tracker
with ID 44983

https://bugs.python.org/issue44983


Coming back to Issue (1), the discrepancy is in the definitions of
yield_expression, return_stmt, augmented_assignment_stmt, and
for_stmt. (That is, the only exception is the definition of
subscription

https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#subscriptions

making the exception look inconsistent and confusing.)

https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#yield-expressions
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-return-statement
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/simple_stmts.html#augmented-assignment-statements
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-for-statement

(In case someone is interested in what are proposed over there, a
summary of the proposal can also be found at

https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/KF37FMD5K5M2ZVTJO6IS3J6M7HHE4VRU/
)
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:59:49adminsetgithub: 89178
2021-08-26 13:49:02Takuo Matsuokacreate