This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: build mode which fails for build failures in extensions
Type: Stage:
Components: Build Versions:
process
Status: open Resolution:
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: doko, petr.viktorin, r.david.murray
Priority: normal Keywords: buildbot

Created on 2008-11-12 09:34 by doko, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin.

Messages (5)
msg75780 - (view) Author: Matthias Klose (doko) * (Python committer) Date: 2008-11-12 09:34
as seen in issue4303, the buildbots don't complain about build failures
in extensions. it would be nice to have a mode, where the build fails
when an extension doesn't build, but is expected to build. exceptions to
this set of expected builds should be configurable.
msg109576 - (view) Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * Date: 2010-07-08 19:31
Would someone with knowledge of the buildbots like to comment please.
msg109816 - (view) Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * (Python committer) Date: 2010-07-10 05:01
One reasonably easy possibility would be to add an option to regrtest to exit with a non-zero return code if there are unexpected skips.  This might not cover 100% of Mathias's cases (but it might), and the configurability would be limited to changing the expected skip lists in regrtest.  But it would be pretty easy to do, if all of the buildbots can be required to build all of the expected extensions.  I'm not sure that this last requirement is currently met by all the buidbots.
msg189914 - (view) Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * Date: 2013-05-24 16:11
Can someone answer the question pointed to by msg109816 i.e. can all of the buildbots build all of the expected extensions?
msg404309 - (view) Author: Petr Viktorin (petr.viktorin) * (Python committer) Date: 2021-10-19 14:42
This would be nice.
Too often when hacking on an extension, test pass just because I don't notice there was a compile error and so I'm testing an older version.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:56:41adminsetgithub: 48554
2021-10-19 14:42:42petr.viktorinsetnosy: + petr.viktorin
messages: + msg404309
2014-02-03 18:28:02BreamoreBoysetnosy: - BreamoreBoy
2013-05-24 16:11:28BreamoreBoysetmessages: + msg189914
2010-07-10 05:01:43r.david.murraysetnosy: + r.david.murray
messages: + msg109816
2010-07-08 19:31:19BreamoreBoysetkeywords: + buildbot
nosy: + BreamoreBoy
messages: + msg109576

2008-11-12 09:34:40dokocreate