➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2020-08-30 20:15 by pablogsal, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 22022 | closed | pablogsal, 2020-08-30 20:48 | |
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg376130 - (view) | Author: Pablo Galindo Salgado (pablogsal) *  |
Date: 2020-08-30 20:15 | |
The eventfd system calls can allow us to implement some Linux-specific high performance version of some event notifier abstractions in the standard library. eventfd() creates an "eventfd object" that can be used as an event wait/notify mechanism by user-space applications. The object contains an unsigned 64-bit integer counter that is maintained by the kernel. This acts as a file descriptor that can be used by the usual suspects (read/write/poll/close...). The advantage here is that the kernel maintains the counter and if used in conjunction with poll/epoll, it allows for a high-performance and scallabe event notification system. |
|||
| msg376144 - (view) | Author: Zackery Spytz (ZackerySpytz) *  |
Date: 2020-08-31 09:57 | |
I think this is a duplicate of bpo-41001. |
|||
| msg376148 - (view) | Author: Pablo Galindo Salgado (pablogsal) * |
Date: 2020-08-31 11:41 | |
Indeed it is. CLosing in favour of bpo-41001 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:35 | admin | set | github: 85834 |
| 2020-08-31 11:41:44 | pablogsal | set | status: open -> closed resolution: duplicate messages: + msg376148 stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2020-08-31 09:57:27 | ZackerySpytz | set | nosy:
+ ZackerySpytz messages: + msg376144 |
| 2020-08-30 20:48:04 | pablogsal | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request21122 |
| 2020-08-30 20:15:17 | pablogsal | create | |