➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2000-07-04 18:52 by twouters, last changed 2022-04-10 16:02 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| None | twouters, 2000-07-04 18:52 | None | ||
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg33034 - (view) | Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) *  |
Date: 2000-07-04 18:52 | |
|
|
|||
| msg33035 - (view) | Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) * |
Date: 2000-07-04 18:55 | |
This patch moves the creation of a new instance (such as slicing and adding/multiplying requires) into a new function, so it can be more easily overridden in derived classes. The name of the new function is completely arbitrary, if there is some convention on naming these things, please tell me ;) |
|||
| msg33036 - (view) | Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) * |
Date: 2000-07-07 12:47 | |
When put like that, agreed. Where's the 'nuke this patch' button again ? :-) |
|||
| msg33037 - (view) | Author: Fredrik Lundh (effbot) * |
Date: 2000-07-07 12:44 | |
-0: I'm a bit sceptical. I think the User types are best seen as subclassable versions of the built-in types, not list/string/dict-like container classes. When types and classes are merged, these should disappear (i.e. UserList = classof([])). In other words, we shouldn't add stuff to the User classes that we don't want in the core implementation. |
|||
| msg33038 - (view) | Author: Fredrik Lundh (effbot) * |
Date: 2000-07-07 12:46 | |
I meant UserList = [].__class__, of course... |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:02:03 | admin | set | github: 32516 |
| 2000-07-04 18:52:32 | twouters | create | |