➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2019-07-19 03:39 by shiyuchong, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg348141 - (view) | Author: 徐靖 (shiyuchong) | Date: 2019-07-19 03:43 | |
In https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.4.html#api-and-feature-removals,It is said "inspect.Signature: positional-only parameters are now required to have a valid name." But in https://docs.python.org/3/library/inspect.html?highlight=3.4#inspect.Signature, the actual change happened in inspect.Parameter, " Changed in version 3.4: In Python 3.3 Parameter objects were allowed to have name set to None if their kind was set to POSITIONAL_ONLY. This is no longer permitted." So I wonder is it a mistake? |
|||
| msg348142 - (view) | Author: Inada Naoki (methane) *  |
Date: 2019-07-19 05:59 | |
https://docs.python.org/3/library/inspect.html#inspect.Parameter.replace """ Changed in version 3.4: In Python 3.3 Parameter objects were allowed to have name set to None if their kind was set to POSITIONAL_ONLY. This is no longer permitted. """ |
|||
| msg367082 - (view) | Author: Inada Naoki (methane) * |
Date: 2020-04-23 06:05 | |
I don't think they are conflict. "now required to have a valid name." "were allowed to have name set to None [snip] This is no longer permitted." "None" is not "valid name". |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:18 | admin | set | github: 81807 |
| 2020-04-23 06:05:52 | methane | set | status: open -> closed resolution: not a bug messages: + msg367082 stage: resolved |
| 2019-07-19 05:59:47 | methane | set | nosy:
+ methane messages: + msg348142 |
| 2019-07-19 05:46:53 | SilentGhost | set | nosy:
+ yselivanov |
| 2019-07-19 03:43:42 | shiyuchong | set | messages: + msg348141 |
| 2019-07-19 03:39:04 | shiyuchong | create | |