under: https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/errors.html

Original it says:
"Note that if the except clauses were reversed (with except B first), it would have printed B, B, B — the first matching except clause is triggered."

It should read:
"Note that if the except clauses were reversed (with except B first), it would have printed D, D, D — the first matching except clause is triggered."
 
As D is the first expression in the print statement.
So if the expression is changed to "except B:"

class B(Exception):
    pass

class C(B):
    pass

class D(C):
    pass

for cls in [B, C, D]:
    try:
        raise cls()
    except B:
        print("D")
    except C:
        print("C")
    except B:
        print("B")

Result is:
D
D
D

It doesn’t make sense to move the “except” line without moving the matching “print” line. According to <https://docs.python.org/3.7/reference/compound_stmts.html#index-1>, “A clause consists of a header and a ‘suite’.” So when it talks about reversing the “except” clauses, that includes reversing the corresponding “print” lines, so they condinue to identify which exception handler was triggered.

The example is correct. If the except clauses were reversed

for cls in [B, C, D]:
    try:
        raise cls()
    except B:
        print("B")
    except C:
        print("C")
    except D:
        print("D")

it would have printed B, B, B.