➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2018-03-19 16:21 by Eric Appelt, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg314100 - (view) | Author: Eric Appelt (Eric Appelt) * | Date: 2018-03-19 16:21 | |
The documentation for the EXTENDED_ARG instruction in the dis module documentation refers to the way the opcode worked before 3.6: https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/dis.html#opcode-EXTENDED_ARG As I understand, since moving to 2-byte wordcode in 3.6, each EXTENDED_ARG effectively adds a byte to the argument of the next instruction and they can be chained to allow up to a 32-bit argument. The current documentation refers the 2-byte arguments from the older bytecode used in 3.5 and below. I'm trying to think of a clear and concise wording for how it works now and will add a PR to fix this issue unless someone gets to it before me. |
|||
| msg314101 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) *  |
Date: 2018-03-19 16:27 | |
Isn't this a duplicate of issue32625? |
|||
| msg314107 - (view) | Author: Eric Appelt (Eric Appelt) * | Date: 2018-03-19 18:09 | |
Yes, thanks. I failed to see the duplicate searching for open issues, closing. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:58 | admin | set | github: 77285 |
| 2018-03-19 18:09:55 | Eric Appelt | set | status: open -> closed resolution: duplicate messages: + msg314107 stage: resolved |
| 2018-03-19 16:27:26 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy:
+ serhiy.storchaka messages: + msg314101 |
| 2018-03-19 16:21:06 | Eric Appelt | create | |