This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Title: Confusing description in Minimal DOM implementation
Type: Stage: resolved
Components: Documentation Versions: Python 2.7
Status: closed Resolution: rejected
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: docs@python Nosy List: docs@python, ned.deily, zhjweizhjwei
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2013-06-19 05:29 by zhjweizhjwei, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (2)
msg191444 - (view) Author: Emcisq Zhao (zhjweizhjwei) Date: 2013-06-19 05:29
Visit, please notice the first paragraph. The last sentence is " should consider using the xml.etree.ElementTree module for their XML processing instead". Shouldn't it be " should consider using the xml.dom.minidom module for their XML processing instead"?
msg191446 - (view) Author: Ned Deily (ned.deily) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-06-19 06:06
No, the intent really is to suggest using the ElementTree module rather than either minidom or any of the other XML modules in the standard library.  Many people find the ElementTree API easier to understand and to use.
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:57:47adminsetgithub: 62461
2013-06-19 06:06:31ned.deilysetstatus: open -> closed

type: resource usage ->

nosy: + ned.deily
messages: + msg191446
resolution: rejected
stage: resolved
2013-06-19 05:29:27zhjweizhjweicreate