This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: test_multiprocessing hang on Windows, non-sockets
Type: behavior Stage: resolved
Components: Versions: Python 3.2, Python 2.7
process
Status: closed Resolution: out of date
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: brianyardy, ezio.melotti, sbt, terry.reedy
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2013-03-12 00:04 by terry.reedy, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
test_multi.txt terry.reedy, 2013-03-12 06:49
mult-test.txt terry.reedy, 2013-03-12 17:32
inherit_socket.py sbt, 2013-03-12 18:41
multi-test2.txt terry.reedy, 2013-03-12 19:33 Tracebacks from inherit_socket.py with 3.2, 3.3
Messages (15)
msg184000 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 00:04
test_multiprocessing is giving multiple errors like
Process Process-21:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\multiprocessing\process.py", line 258, in _bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\multiprocessing\process.py", line 114, in run
    self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\test\test_multiprocessing.py", line 1703, in _test
    conn.send('hello')
IOError: [Errno 10038] An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket
...
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\test\test_multiprocessing.py", line 1419, in _putter
    manager.connect()
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\multiprocessing\managers.py", line 500, in connect
    conn = Client(self._address, authkey=self._authkey)
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 465, in XmlClient
    return ConnectionWrapper(Client(*args, **kwds), _xml_dumps, _xml_loads)
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 175, in Client
    answer_challenge(c, authkey)
  File "F:\Python\dev\py27\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 420, in answer_challenge
    message = connection.recv_bytes(256)         # reject large message
IOError: [Errno 10038] An operation was attempted on something that is not a socket

After a few of these, it hangs and I have to either kill multiple processes with TaskManager (or maybe kill-python would work) or kill the console. All tracebacks seem to one of these two. The common factor is 'not a socket'. It seems that something in the test should be skipped on windows. I got similar results running test_multiprocessing by itself. The process numbers are haphazard.
msg184001 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 00:26
For 3.3 and 3.4, test went on for several minutes putting out [###### refs] lines but finally said '1 test OK'. I tried 3.2 again and it never outputs refs lines but fairly soon gives errors.
msg184013 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 06:49
running kill-python results in
Warning -- threading._dangling was modified by test_multiprocessing
Warning -- multiprocessing.process._dangling was modified by test_multiprocessing
test test_multiprocessing failed -- multiple errors occurred; run in verbose mode for details

-v added the attached details, and the test finished, though failed.
msg184018 - (view) Author: Richard Oudkerk (sbt) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 11:31
Does this happen every time you run the tests?  (I don't see these errors.)
msg184030 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 16:31
All 4 or 5 times I tried on 3.2, yes.
msg184035 - (view) Author: Richard Oudkerk (sbt) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 17:09
Could you try the following program:

import socket
import multiprocessing
import multiprocessing.reduction
import multiprocessing.connection

def socketpair():
    with socket.socket() as l:
        l.bind(('localhost', 0))
        l.listen(1)
        s = socket.socket()
        s.connect(l.getsockname())
        a, _ = l.accept()
        return s, a

def bar(s):
    print(s)
    s.sendall(b'from bar')

if __name__ == '__main__':
    a, b = socketpair()
    p = multiprocessing.Process(target=bar, args=(b,))
    p.start()
    b.close()
    print(a.recv(100))
msg184037 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 17:32
In Command Prompt, 3.2 gave same error as before, 3.3 a different error.
multi-test.txt has full tracebacks.
msg184039 - (view) Author: Richard Oudkerk (sbt) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 18:41
Now could you try the attached file?  (It will not work on 2.7 because a missing socket.fromfd().)

P.S. It looks like the error for 3.3 is associated with a file f:\python\mypy\traceback.py which presumably clashes with the one in the standard library.
msg184046 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 19:33
Both 3.2 and 3.3 give essentially the same traceback as 3.2 did before, both with installed python and yesterdays debug builds.
msg184050 - (view) Author: Richard Oudkerk (sbt) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 21:24
> Both 3.2 and 3.3 give essentially the same traceback as 3.2 did before, 
> both with installed python and yesterdays debug builds.

It looks like on your machine socket handles are not correctly inherited by child processes -- I had assumed that they always would be.

I suppose to fix things for 3.2 and earlier it would be necessary to backport the functionality of socket.socket.share() and socket.fromshare() from 3.3.
msg184054 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 22:16
My original report was for 32 bit debug build on 64 bit Win 7 machine. I just re-ran test_multiprocessing with installed 64 bit python with same result. Was "I don't see these errors." on different Windows or non-Windows.

One option is to skip the failing sub-tests on Windows, like some other sub-tests:
skipped 'does not work with windows sockets'
and consider the limitation on use of multi-processing in 2.7,3.2 as "won't fix". (My view is that 3.2 users should upgrade as soon as dependencies allow.) Backporting new features requires pydev discussion.
msg184055 - (view) Author: Richard Oudkerk (sbt) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 22:24
> My original report was for 32 bit debug build on 64 bit Win 7 machine.
> I just re-ran test_multiprocessing with installed 64 bit python with same 
> result. Was "I don't see these errors." on different Windows or non-Windows.

On 64-bit Windows 7 with both 32 and 64 bit builds.

> One option is to skip the failing sub-tests on Windows, like some other sub-tests:
> skipped 'does not work with windows sockets'
> and consider the limitation on use of multi-processing in 2.7,3.2 as "won't fix". 
> (My view is that 3.2 users should upgrade as soon as dependencies allow.) 

Yes, I would be inclined to do that.

> Backporting new features requires pydev discussion.

I only meant exposing that functionality in the private _multiprocessing extension.
msg184059 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2013-03-12 23:27
Same OS, different hardware, drivers, and buried settings, surprisingly different behavior. Oh, well. I will test any changes you decide on that need testing.
msg221683 - (view) Author: brian yardy (brianyardy) Date: 2014-06-27 12:10
All 4 or 5 times I tried on 3.2, yes.
In Command Prompt, 3.2 gave same error as before, 3.3 a different error.
multi-test.txt has full tracebacks.'http://www.einstantloan.co.uk/'
msg221695 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2014-06-27 17:21
This is no longer a 3.x issue. 3.2 and 3.3 get security fixes only. For 3.4, test_multiprocessing is split into 4 files and all run in multiple tries. Test_multiprocessing_spawn takes a minute, but it does 264 + 20 skipped tests, including a few 'wait' tests.

Three tries with 2.7 also passed.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:57:42adminsetgithub: 61601
2014-06-27 17:21:49terry.reedysetstatus: open -> closed
resolution: out of date
messages: + msg221695

stage: needs patch -> resolved
2014-06-27 12:10:42brianyardysetnosy: + brianyardy
messages: + msg221683
2013-03-12 23:27:34terry.reedysetmessages: + msg184059
2013-03-12 22:24:20sbtsetmessages: + msg184055
2013-03-12 22:16:27terry.reedysetmessages: + msg184054
2013-03-12 21:42:28terry.reedysetmessages: - msg184043
2013-03-12 21:42:04terry.reedysetmessages: - msg184042
2013-03-12 21:24:13sbtsetmessages: + msg184050
2013-03-12 19:33:32terry.reedysetfiles: + multi-test2.txt

messages: + msg184046
2013-03-12 19:17:52terry.reedysetmessages: + msg184043
2013-03-12 19:06:15terry.reedysetmessages: + msg184042
2013-03-12 18:41:46sbtsetfiles: + inherit_socket.py

messages: + msg184039
2013-03-12 17:32:32terry.reedysetfiles: + mult-test.txt

messages: + msg184037
2013-03-12 17:09:36sbtsetmessages: + msg184035
2013-03-12 16:31:04terry.reedysetmessages: + msg184030
2013-03-12 11:31:55sbtsetmessages: + msg184018
2013-03-12 06:49:37terry.reedysetfiles: + test_multi.txt

messages: + msg184013
2013-03-12 00:26:25terry.reedysetmessages: + msg184001
2013-03-12 00:04:04terry.reedycreate