Message99363
eval() is a known security hole. Since Python 2.6 ast.literal_eval() provides a better alternative in many cases. literal_eval() is not as well known as eval() and not easy to find even if you know it exists (but don't remember the name).
eval() comes up over and over in the Python-tutor list and the attendant warnings are repeated ad nauseum; literal_eval() is rarely mentioned as an alternative.
Suggestion: in the docs for eval(), put a warning about security risks and a cross-reference to literal_eval(). For example:
Warning: eval() executes any expression and should be used only with trusted input. ast.literal_eval() is a safe alternative for evaluating expressions containing only Python literals.
Thanks! |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-02-15 13:38:20 | kjohnson | set | recipients:
+ kjohnson, georg.brandl |
2010-02-15 13:38:19 | kjohnson | set | messageid: <1266241099.84.0.200250637967.issue7935@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-02-15 13:38:18 | kjohnson | link | issue7935 messages |
2010-02-15 13:38:16 | kjohnson | create | |
|