Message95508
Just for clarification, why does "ci" get padded but "ic" doesn't?
While I agree that updating the documentation would help clarify,
perhaps either everything should be padded to word boundaries or
nothing should.
It is weird behavior that "ic" != "ci". If both formats were 8 bytes
then my first thought would have been "Oh, it's just getting padded",
but with this inconsistency it appeared as a bug.
Whatever the reason behind this discrepancy is, it should definitely be
included in the doc updates. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-11-19 19:03:19 | sgk284 | set | recipients:
+ sgk284, mark.dickinson, eric.smith |
2009-11-19 19:03:19 | sgk284 | set | messageid: <1258657399.32.0.885520752464.issue7355@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-11-19 19:03:18 | sgk284 | link | issue7355 messages |
2009-11-19 19:03:18 | sgk284 | create | |
|