Message 94613 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	wrichert
Recipients	belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, rhettinger, wrichert
Date	2009-10-28.08:13:51
SpamBayes Score	1.2964239e-07
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1256717633.08.0.644715697972.issue7212@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
No particular reason, besides that it is ripped off of pop(). Your solution (omitting "register") gives the same performance. Looks cleaner, of course. The patch tries to provide a clean way of "for x in some_set: break", as explained above. See the recent python-dev mailing list musings.

No particular reason, besides that it is ripped off of pop().

Your solution (omitting "register") gives the same performance. Looks
cleaner, of course.

The patch tries to provide a clean way of "for x in some_set: break", as
explained above. See the recent python-dev mailing list musings.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-10-28 08:13:53	wrichert	set	recipients: + wrichert, rhettinger, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson
2009-10-28 08:13:53	wrichert	set	messageid: <1256717633.08.0.644715697972.issue7212@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-10-28 08:13:51	wrichert	link	issue7212 messages
2009-10-28 08:13:51	wrichert	create