Message93057
> This version uses posix_spawn rather than execv to start the real
> interpreter.
In what way is that better? It creates a new process (IIUC); therefore,
I think that using it is worse than using execv. Anybody killing the
pythonw process would only kill the wrapper.
> The main advantage of the new implementation is that 'arch
> -ppc pythonw' works as expected, with the current version of pythonw the
> 'arch' command only affects the pythonw executable and not the real
> interpreter.
I suppose this would also be possible through execv? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-09-24 07:30:18 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, ronaldoussoren |
2009-09-24 07:30:16 | loewis | link | issue6834 messages |
2009-09-24 07:30:16 | loewis | create | |
|