Message86701
Well, the reason I put in the inner row/col namedtuple initially was
because the first mistake I made with the original module was mixing up
the row/col indices for a particular case. It certainly caused all sorts
of weird headaches. :o)
I mean, it seems like there's no real reason it "should" be (row,col)
instead of (col,row) in the returned tuple; that is, it feels like the
ordering is arbitrary in and of itself.
I really feel that allowing for start.row and start.col would make the
interface completely explicit and valid semantically.
Agreed with the other two points, however.
Also, I take it there's going to be a need for an addendum to the test
suite, since the interface is being modified? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-04-27 21:50:04 | mallyvai | set | recipients:
+ mallyvai, rhettinger |
2009-04-27 21:50:04 | mallyvai | set | messageid: <1240869004.03.0.0539191177749.issue5857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-04-27 21:50:02 | mallyvai | link | issue5857 messages |
2009-04-27 21:50:01 | mallyvai | create | |
|