Message85955
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 at 09:29, jvdias wrote:
> jvdias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Thanks for responding !
You are welcome. If you want something to happen, though,
you'll have to get support from the community and submit
a patch.
> Can't Python provide a better print() implementation or a fflush()
> implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed ?
> Perhaps something like PERL's IO::Handle::autoflush() ?
Is there some way in which sys.stdout.flush() is not equivalent to "an
fflush implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed"?
> Maybe I should raise another "fflush() support required" bug ?
If it's a real issue, yes. But I don't think it is.
--David |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-04-14 01:00:59 | r.david.murray-old | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray-old, r.david.murray, jvdias |
2009-04-14 01:00:58 | r.david.murray-old | link | issue5725 messages |
2009-04-14 01:00:57 | r.david.murray-old | create | |
|