Message84639
Hey Jesse,
It was good meeting you at Pycon. I don't have anything handy at the moment
although, if memory serves, the most trivial of example seemed to illustrate
the problem. Basically any situation where a joinable queue would keep
bumping up against being empty (ie retiring items faster than they are being
fed), and does enough work between get() and task_done() to be preempted
would eventually break. FWIW I was running on a Windows box.
I am afraid I am away from my computer until late tonight but I can try to
cook something up then (I presume you are sprinting today?). Also I think
the issue becomes clear when you think about what happens if
joinablequeue.task_done() gets preempted between its few lines.
-brian
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jesse Noller <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Jesse Noller <jnoller@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Hi Brian - do you have a chunk of code that exacerbates this? I'm having
> problems reproducing this, and need a test so I can prove out the fix.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4660>
> _______________________________________
> |
File name |
Uploaded |
unnamed
|
merrellb,
2009-03-30.20:25:31
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-03-30 20:25:34 | merrellb | set | recipients:
+ merrellb, jnoller |
2009-03-30 20:25:32 | merrellb | link | issue4660 messages |
2009-03-30 20:25:32 | merrellb | create | |
|