This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author forest
Recipients akuchling, djarb, facundobatista, forest, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, jafo, josiahcarlson, markb
Date 2009-03-02.23:00:48
SpamBayes Score 4.7388264e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1236034852.66.0.634000936892.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm looking forward to having this functionality in asyncore.  It would
help me remove some unwanted hackery from my own code.

Giampaolo, I'm concerned that your patch uses a global 'tasks' list
which cannot be overriden.  Shouldn't loop() accept an optional task
list argument, as it already does with the socket map?  That would keep
with the spirit of asyncore and make things easier for those of us who
use multiple event loops in multiple threads.

Josiah, is your updated sched module the one described in this blog
post?  Is there an issue in the bug tracker about it?
http://chouyu-31.livejournal.com/316112.html
History
Date User Action Args
2009-03-02 23:00:53forestsetrecipients: + forest, gvanrossum, akuchling, facundobatista, jafo, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola, djarb, markb
2009-03-02 23:00:52forestsetmessageid: <1236034852.66.0.634000936892.issue1641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-03-02 23:00:49forestlinkissue1641 messages
2009-03-02 23:00:48forestcreate