This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ringhome
Recipients gpolo, ringhome
Date 2009-02-21.05:45:24
SpamBayes Score 1.3019585e-12
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <91795F94-A327-4581-96E4-7727DD0AE480@cox.net>
In-reply-to <1235158595.14.0.264813276175.issue5163@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Just an ignorance issue, I supposed.  I didn't realize that it was  
that simple.  Still a novice at all of the methods available.

In that case, the only advantage is in case you don't want to always  
manually set it to the end.  No good reason to change it otherwise.

On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Guilherme Polo wrote:

>
> Guilherme Polo <ggpolo@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Do you mean something like this:
>
> import Tkinter
>
> def insert():
>    text.insert('end', 'buh\n')
>    text.see('end')
>    text.after(100, insert)
>
> text = Tkinter.Text()
> text.pack(expand=True, fill='both', side='left')
> vbar = Tkinter.Scrollbar(orient='vertical', command=text.yview)
> vbar.pack(side='right', fill='y')
> text.configure(yscrollcommand=vbar.set)
> text.after(100, insert)
>
> text.mainloop()
>
> (or change Tkinter by tkinter to work on python 3.x)
> Text.see already does what you want, can you argue why adding an  
> option
> for that would be good ?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +gpolo
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5163>
> _______________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-21 05:45:27ringhomesetrecipients: + ringhome, gpolo
2009-02-21 05:45:25ringhomelinkissue5163 messages
2009-02-21 05:45:24ringhomecreate