Message82209
>> BTW, there's a warning in _struct.c:180 -> warning: 'get_ulong'
>> defined but not used, should I open a new issue?
>
> Sure. Please could you add me to the nosy list if you do.
OK, should do that soon.
> In my opinion, the struct module *really* needs an overhaul, especially
> for py3k; there's a lot of inconsistency in the behaviour with respect
> to different integer types, and there's a lot of code that seems to be
> there purely for backwards compatibility that could be removed for 3.1
> (and probably for 2.7 as well): for example, allowing floats when
> packing integer types, and allowing overflow to wraparound rather than
> raising an exception.
This one looks bad: #2590.
> Would it be worth opening a general 'overhaul the struct module' issue
> and marking all the current struct bugs as dependencies for this issue?
I can't judge on the merit of struct's shortcomings, but I'll propose
the 'umbrella issue' idea for other targets (socket, HTMLParser,
etc.) on python-dev and can suggest one for struct too. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-16 02:43:23 | ajaksu2 | set | recipients:
+ ajaksu2, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou |
2009-02-16 02:43:22 | ajaksu2 | link | issue3694 messages |
2009-02-16 02:43:21 | ajaksu2 | create | |
|