Message80292
Hi!
that sounds
> like a behavior change. I'd be fine with removing it for the 3.1/2.7
version of
> this code (though I hope people will be using the C implementation
instead).
Well, either it's supported and it will have to go through a deprecation
phase, or it's unsupported and it can be ripped out right now...
I don't think it should be supported at all, given that the semantics of
writing an iterable of ints are totally non-obvious. Reading both the
PEP and the docstrings in io.py, I only see mentions of "bytes" and
"buffer", not of an iterable of ints. Perhaps Guido should pronounce.
(do you know of any code relying on this behaviour? the C version
obviously does not support it and all regression tests pass fine, except
for an SSL bug I filed)
http://codereview.appspot.com/12470 |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-01-20 23:27:51 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, beazley, amaury.forgeotdarc |
2009-01-20 23:27:50 | pitrou | link | issue4428 messages |
2009-01-20 23:27:50 | pitrou | create | |
|