Message73564
dbm.error is documented as a tuple, and I'd prefer not to change this:
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/dbm.html#dbm.error
Since it says that its first member is another dbm.error exception,
we could simply raise error[0](message)
Attached another patch, with the same test case. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-09-22 11:14:24 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | recipients:
+ amaury.forgeotdarc, hagen |
2008-09-22 11:14:24 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | messageid: <1222082064.27.0.737371325105.issue3929@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2008-09-22 11:13:24 | amaury.forgeotdarc | link | issue3929 messages |
2008-09-22 11:13:23 | amaury.forgeotdarc | create | |
|