➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jnoller
Recipients barry, benjamin.peterson, jnoller, mishok13, ncoghlan
Date 2008-08-19.15:36:29
SpamBayes Score 6.663709e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4222a8490808190836ib5f1eefj45b1014742ad9091@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1219160096.2.0.499511557815.issue3352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> is_alive appears to be a potentially expensive check for the
> multiprocessing side of things, which is why I'm inclined to leave it as
> a method. "if t.is_alive():" actually reads better to me than "if
> t.alive:" anyway.

Dang, I already cut that one over.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-08-19 15:36:30jnollersetrecipients: + jnoller, barry, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, mishok13
2008-08-19 15:36:29jnollerlinkissue3352 messages
2008-08-19 15:36:29jnollercreate