Message70981
So I assumed.
In that case, why is there a "fromhex"? (Was that put in there before
the notion of transform/untransform?) As I've been saying, it's weird to
have a fromhex but not a tohex.
Anyway, assuming we go to 3.1 and add transform/untransform, I suppose
fromhex will remain for backwards, and tohex will not be needed. So I
guess this issue is closed. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-08-10 12:45:15 | mgiuca | set | recipients:
+ mgiuca, loewis, georg.brandl, orsenthil |
2008-08-10 12:45:15 | mgiuca | set | messageid: <1218372315.12.0.197634675498.issue3532@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2008-08-10 12:45:14 | mgiuca | link | issue3532 messages |
2008-08-10 12:45:14 | mgiuca | create | |
|