Message 70805 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	brett.cannon
Recipients	brett.cannon, gvanrossum, pitrou
Date	2008-08-06.21:28:53
SpamBayes Score	0.0024859083
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<bbaeab100808061428m223526deuadba6529fdbfdd39@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1218053557.26.0.142168657254.issue3506@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> added the comment: > >> Well, if it can't replace buffer() then the warning needs to change to >> just flat-out state that buffer() is gone and not suggest any >> replacement. > > +1. buffer() stinks. memoryview() rules. They don't hvae the same use > cases. > That settles that then. > Is there truly nobody else who understands PEP 3118 well enough? Not me.

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> added the comment:
>
>> Well, if it can't replace buffer() then the warning needs to change to
>> just flat-out state that buffer() is gone and not suggest any
>> replacement.
>
> +1.  buffer() stinks.  memoryview() rules.  They don't hvae the same use
> cases.
>

That settles that then.

> Is there truly nobody else who understands PEP 3118 well enough?

Not me.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-08-06 21:28:54	brett.cannon	set	recipients: + brett.cannon, gvanrossum, pitrou
2008-08-06 21:28:54	brett.cannon	link	issue3506 messages
2008-08-06 21:28:53	brett.cannon	create