This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mmokrejs
Recipients loewis, mmokrejs
Date 2008-07-03.07:23:38
SpamBayes Score 0.0029897322
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1215069819.91.0.274147093665.issue3264@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Could it be the name clashing problem between -lcrypt and -lcrypto?

bash-3.00# ar x /usr/lib/libcrypt.a;nm -g des_crypt.o
         U ___errno
0000033c T _des_crypt
00000274 T _des_encrypt
         U _des_encrypt1
000001b0 T _des_setkey
         U _mutex_lock
         U _mutex_unlock
         U _thr_getspecific
         U _thr_keycreate
         U _thr_setspecific
0000033c W des_crypt
00000274 W des_encrypt
000001b0 W des_setkey
         U free
         U malloc
bash-3.00# ar x /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.a;nm -g des_crypt.o
         U ___errno
0000033c T _des_crypt
00000274 T _des_encrypt
         U _des_encrypt1
000001b0 T _des_setkey
         U _mutex_lock
         U _mutex_unlock
         U _thr_getspecific
         U _thr_keycreate
         U _thr_setspecific
0000033c W des_crypt
00000274 W des_encrypt
000001b0 W des_setkey
         U free
         U malloc
bash-3.00#

There used to be name clashes between -lcrypt from KTH-KRB/HEIMDAL
with those from openssl -lcrypto in the past. I think that was
"fixed" around/in openssl-2.7 and heimdal-1.0. The clashes caused
openssh dying when compiled with kerberos4 support because the
functions of same names expected in some way different data.
I am sure you would Goggle it out.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-07-03 07:23:40mmokrejssetspambayes_score: 0.00298973 -> 0.0029897322
recipients: + mmokrejs, loewis
2008-07-03 07:23:39mmokrejssetspambayes_score: 0.00298973 -> 0.00298973
messageid: <1215069819.91.0.274147093665.issue3264@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-07-03 07:23:39mmokrejslinkissue3264 messages
2008-07-03 07:23:38mmokrejscreate