Message 66833 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	Rhamphoryncus, rhettinger
Date	2008-05-14.20:59:10
SpamBayes Score	0.03195305
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1210798752.6.0.89730082059.issue2778@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
By replacing temporary immutability with temporary hashability, does this approach create the possibility that someone could mutate the key- set during a search? Is it possible to get the __eq__ check out-of- sync with the __hash__ value? Also, after a quick look at the patch, I'm not too keen on any modifications to set_swap_bodies() nor with changing the signature of set_contains_key().

By replacing temporary immutability with temporary hashability, does 
this approach create the possibility that someone could mutate the key-
set during a search?  Is it possible to get the __eq__ check out-of-
sync with the __hash__ value?

Also, after a quick look at the patch, I'm not too keen on any 
modifications to set_swap_bodies() nor with changing the signature of 
set_contains_key().

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-05-14 20:59:13	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0319531 -> 0.03195305 recipients: + rhettinger, Rhamphoryncus
2008-05-14 20:59:12	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.0319531 -> 0.0319531 messageid: <1210798752.6.0.89730082059.issue2778@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-05-14 20:59:11	rhettinger	link	issue2778 messages
2008-05-14 20:59:10	rhettinger	create