Message 65824 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger
Date	2008-04-25.23:10:35
SpamBayes Score	0.016089583
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<ca471dc20804251610u23925ae3kc641071ce5e66233@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1afaf6160804251540j51b21b58od9091786fa2d0789@mail.gmail.com>

Content
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > If it makes any difference, the attributes aren't even available through Python. But they are deducible via the str() or repr(). And IMO they should be available. I think I'd be okay with normalization on creation, so that range(0, 5, 2) returns range(0, 6, 2). Hm, but isn't that odd? Why not the other way around?

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>  If it makes any difference, the attributes aren't even available through Python.

But they are deducible via the str() or repr(). And IMO they *should*
be available.

I think I'd be okay with normalization on creation, so that range(0,
5, 2) returns range(0, 6, 2). Hm, but isn't that odd? Why not the
other way around?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-25 23:10:38	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.0160896 -> 0.016089583 recipients: + gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson
2008-04-25 23:10:37	gvanrossum	link	issue2603 messages
2008-04-25 23:10:36	gvanrossum	create