➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2008-04-25.22:38:38
SpamBayes Score 0.010468133
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <ca471dc20804251538t7bde42at2ddb5d1b653668f2@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1209163010.69.0.702141445677.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
>  Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
>  Thanks for the help.
>
>  Yes, after thinking for a while, I decided that range equality should
>  represent the set of integers and not the values in the constructor.
>  Normalization would be a good idea, but I think that's another issue
>  I'll tackle after this.

The two go hand-in-hand; you shouldn't have two range() objects that
compare equal and yet have different stop attribute values.

>  Now you get an error for hashing a huge range.
>
>  Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10110/range_eq8.patch
>
>
>
>  __________________________________
>  Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
>  <http://bugs.python.org/issue2603>
>  __________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-25 22:38:41gvanrossumsetspambayes_score: 0.0104681 -> 0.010468133
recipients: + gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson
2008-04-25 22:38:40gvanrossumlinkissue2603 messages
2008-04-25 22:38:39gvanrossumcreate