Message 65819 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger
Date	2008-04-25.22:12:22
SpamBayes Score	0.14746843
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<d38f5330804251512s3b8861cfs3bdc76b856db8765@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1209160668.96.0.077281338739.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > - Did you change your mind about range equality? > range(0,10,2) == range(0,9,2) > seems True now; it was not with range_eq6.patch > This makes me think: what would you say to an idea to normalize ranges in constructor so that range(5,10,2) returns range(5,11,2).

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
>  - Did you change your mind about range equality?
>   range(0,10,2) == range(0,9,2)
>  seems True now; it was not with range_eq6.patch
>

This makes me think: what would you say to an idea to normalize ranges
in constructor so that range(5,10,2) returns range(5,11,2).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-25 22:12:24	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.147468 -> 0.14746843 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, benjamin.peterson
2008-04-25 22:12:23	belopolsky	link	issue2603 messages
2008-04-25 22:12:22	belopolsky	create