This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author jkrukoff
Recipients PiDelport, georg.brandl, jkrukoff, ncoghlan, terry.reedy
Date 2008-04-22.18:25:28
SpamBayes Score 0.002876754
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1208888730.57.0.830098156043.issue643841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I've been following the py3k maliing list disscussion for this issue, 
and wanted to add a note about the proposed solution described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-April/013004.html

The reason I think this approach is valuable is that in all of the 
proxy classes I've written, I'm concerned about which behaviour of the 
proxied class I want to override, not which behaviour I want to keep. 
In other words, when I proxy something, my mental model has always 
been, okay, I want something that behaves just like X, except it does 
this (usually small bit) differently.

This is also why I expect my proxies to keep working the same when I 
change the proxied class, without having to go and update the proxy to 
also use the new behaviour.

So, yeah, very much in favor of a base proxy class in the standard 
library.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-22 18:25:31jkrukoffsetspambayes_score: 0.00287675 -> 0.002876754
recipients: + jkrukoff, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, PiDelport
2008-04-22 18:25:30jkrukoffsetspambayes_score: 0.00287675 -> 0.00287675
messageid: <1208888730.57.0.830098156043.issue643841@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-22 18:25:29jkrukofflinkissue643841 messages
2008-04-22 18:25:29jkrukoffcreate